Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!hellgate.utah.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!apple!bridge2!csi!nsc!pyramid!csg
From: csg@pyramid.pyramid.com (Carl S. Gutekunst)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp
Subject: Re: uucico timeout
Message-ID: <83250@pyramid.pyramid.com>
Date: 5 Sep 89 02:24:08 GMT
References: <9321@chinet.chi.il.us> <462@nixpbe.UUCP> <1010@apctrc.UUCP>
Reply-To: csg@pyramid.pyramid.com (Carl S. Gutekunst)
Organization: Pyramid Technology Corp., Mountain View, CA
Lines: 15

In article <1010@apctrc.UUCP> zjat02@apctrc.UUCP (Jon A. Tankersley) writes:
>The retry time is sometimes a no-op.  Under Sun's BNU UUCP implementation,
>it kinda ignores it, except to disable some retry (even by hand).

Uh, Sun doesn't *have* a BNU UUCP, so this might explain why this doesn't
work. SunOS 4.1 will be BNU.

>Lastly - TB+ problem at 19200, getting protocol errors on Sun ports under
>4.0.3 (lots) and 4.0.1 (very infrequent).  Sun recommended using 9600 for
>the tty port connection and letting the TB+ negotiate with PEP still.

Use the A and B ports for TrailBlazers, not the ALM or Systech. It will work
much better.

<csg>