Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!sharkey!itivax!abaa!esker
From: esker@abaa.uucp (Lawrence Esker)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: VD0 help
Message-ID: <2500@abaa.UUCP>
Date: 7 Sep 89 03:03:27 GMT
References: <935@wsu-cs.uucp> <11102@boulder.Colorado.EDU> <26766@shemp.CS.UCLA.EDU> <1517@unocss.UUCP>
Reply-To: esker@abaa.UUCP (Lawrence Esker)
Organization: Allen Bradley
Lines: 6

I was wondering (not meant to be a flame), but why use VD0: anymore?  What does
it offer that RAD: doesn't?  Why did Perry upgrade it after RAD: came out?

Comparative data and other responses are welcome.  Just wondering!
--
UseNet Path: __!mailrus!sharkey!itivax!abaa!esker  ==  esker@abaa.UUCP