Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!iuvax!cica!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!pt.cs.cmu.edu!andrew.cmu.edu!<UNAUTHENTICATED>+
From: mjw@cs.cmu.edu (Michael Witbrock)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Hey C= , will 1.4 have the same license as 1.3.2
Message-ID: <cZ1iHEm00hkeE21aJy@cs.cmu.edu>
Date: 7 Sep 89 21:59:44 GMT
References: <3523@seashore.nprdc.arpa>
Organization: Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Lines: 14
In-Reply-To: <3523@seashore.nprdc.arpa>

Jim Apple says:
"I do NOT WORK on nuclear research.   But I AM OFFENDED
by the "license"  and I will not but a commodore product that has it. "

-
I am delighted by the 'licence' and believe that it would be
an excellent tool to use in persuading people to by 
Commodore/A products. If it is, in fact, the new standard Commodore/A
licence, than Commodore/A is a far cooler company than even the
existence of the Amiga would have suggested.

What you lose on the swings, you make up on the round-a-bouts.

Michael