Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!ginosko!uunet!cbmvax!mitchell
From: mitchell@cbmvax.UUCP (Fred Mitchell - QA)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: Rebuttal time
Message-ID: <7816@cbmvax.UUCP>
Date: 3 Sep 89 06:27:33 GMT
References: <8908252144.AA27005@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> <123950@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> <16658@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> <16662@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU>
Reply-To: mitchell@cbmvax.UUCP (Fred Mitchell - QA)
Organization: Commodore Technology, West Chester, PA
Lines: 19

In article <16662@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> jlemon@cory.Berkeley.EDU.UUCP (Jonathan Lemon) writes:
>}
>}Anyone who says otherwise must not have had much experience with
>}multitasking OSs.
>
>Me too.  I would really like multi-tasking on my mega!  In the end, I had
>to decide that the other little advantages of the Mega outweighted the
>multi-tasking of the Amiga.  (at least for my case)
>--
>Jonathan   ...ucbvax!cory!jlemon    jlemon@cory.Berkeley.EDU

What were these advantages, if you don't mind me asking? Thanks.
-- 

                                   |*******************************************|
	-Compliments of	       /// |* All thoughts and comments are soley     *|
	 Fred Mitchell	   \\\///  |* thoses of The Author and has nothing to *|
			    \XX/   |* do with Commodore-Amiga.		      *|
   Software QA - Commodore-Amiga   |*******************************************|