Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!rice!mackerel.rice.EDU!bgr
From: bgr@mackerel.rice.EDU (Robert G. Rhode)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: Duesseldorf: ...
Message-ID: <1129@brazos.Rice.edu>
Date: 7 Sep 89 19:30:10 GMT
References: <544@cwjcc.CWRU.Edu> <8908251936.AA19454@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> <1572@laura.UUCP> <45613885.14a1f@force.UUCP> <9475@chinet.chi.il.us> <1680@atari.UUCP>
Sender: root@rice.edu
Reply-To: bgr@owlnet.rice.edu
Followup-To: comp.sys.atari.st
Lines: 15

In article <544@cwjcc.CWRU.Edu>, bammi@dsrgsun.ces.cwru.edu (Jwahar R.
Bammi) writes:

> is it "pure" SVr3.1 or SVr3.1 with enough "bezerkley" extensions so that
> one may do useful work (like run X windows), as is usually the case.

I still haven't heard the answer to the big question (in my mind):  Can
it run one or more
TOS sessions in separate windows?  Unix in one xterm and TOS in another
would sure be nice.
Sounds like a Sun 386i; hmmm, you don't say...


				Robert Rhode
			Rice University, Houston, TX