Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!blake!ramsiri
From: ramsiri@blake.acs.washington.edu (Enartloc Nhoj)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: TT announcement
Message-ID: <3553@blake.acs.washington.edu>
Date: 9 Sep 89 18:29:17 GMT
References: <3497@blake.acs.washington.edu> <545@cwjcc.CWRU.Edu> <22003@cup.portal.com> <Sep.9.13.44.07.1989.11918@topaz.rutgers.edu>
Reply-To: ramsiri@blake.acs.washington.edu (Enartloc Nhoj)
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Lines: 23

In article <Sep.9.13.44.07.1989.11918@topaz.rutgers.edu> clong@topaz.rutgers.edu (Chris Long) writes:
>
>On a related topic, *why* doesn't Atari come out with a machine that
>comes with, as standard equipment, a PC emulator?  A Mac emulator
>might not also be a bad idea.
>
>Atari would clean up.
>-- 

A bit tough to ask of a "company" 
who can't even PROVIDE an updated OS for
a machine that has already existed for 4 years.

My question is: *why* doesn't ATARI come out with a machine
they purportedly have been designing for several years...


"might not also be a bad idea."

"Atari [should] clean up [their act] ."

-kevin
ramsiri@blake.acs.washington.edu