Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!blake!max!scott
From: scott@max.u.washington.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.cbm
Subject: Re: WHY no COMP.BINARIES.CBM ?????
Message-ID: <6643@max.u.washington.edu>
Date: 8 Sep 89 21:00:47 GMT
References: <6597@max.u.washington.edu> <9947@eerie.acsu.Buffalo.EDU>
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle WA
Lines: 17

In article <9947@eerie.acsu.Buffalo.EDU>, bowen@mira.cs.Buffalo.EDU (Devon Bowen) writes:
> In article <6597@max.u.washington.edu>, scott@max.u.washington.edu writes:
>> How come there isn't a newsgroup called "comp.binaries.cbm"???
>>
>> I know that this question has been asked before, but I didn't see
>> any reasonable answer to the question?
>
> Simply because it didn't have enough support to be voted in. The way the
> system is set up there doesn't have to be a reason to not have it, but
> rather there has to be enough support to have it.
>
> Devon
 
From where those that support must come from? Do we have any input in
that support?
 
Scott.