Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.csd.uwm.edu!srcsip!ernest!rogers
From: rogers@SRC.Honeywell.COM (Brynn Rogers)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: Norton Si
Message-ID: <29867@srcsip.UUCP>
Date: 1 Sep 89 13:33:32 GMT
References: <478@v7fs1.UUCP> <224@orchid.warwick.ac.uk> <1989Aug25.162653.25755@ziebmef.mef.org> <408@nosun.UUCP>
Sender: news@src.honeywell.COM
Reply-To: rogers@src.honeywell.com (Brynn Rogers)
Organization: Honeywell Systems & Research Center
Lines: 10


Okay, the norton SI is bad.

How good is the landmark AT test (expressed in Mhz) that I see more and 
more advertisers quoting?

BTW, I did a rough calculation (guess) and found that a 50Mhz 486 would
rate between 200 and 330 on the Norton SI. (just for fun!)
 Brynn Rogers    Honeywell S&RC        rogers@src.honeywell.com
 work 612-782-7577 home 874-7737