Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!iuvax!ndcheg!ndmath!nstar!larry
From: larry@nstar.UUCP (Larry Snyder)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: DESQview, any opinions out there?
Summary: all charge card
Keywords: DESQview, Quarterdeck, QEMM
Message-ID: <30@nstar.UUCP>
Date: 4 Sep 89 03:48:31 GMT
References: <4808@ubc-cs.UUCP> <519@aftp.UUCP>
Organization: The Northern Star, Notre Dame, IN USA
Lines: 22

In article <519@aftp.UUCP>, arnesen@aftp.UUCP (Geir Arnesen) writes:
> I run an AT286 with Desqview 2.2 and 4mB ram, used as extended. And with
> an extra card (All charge card) - a MMU which is placed between the
> 286 processor and the processor socket. This card does the same which
> is possible to do with software on a 386 (Qemm.sys and 386max). This card
> handles the memory, and gives me possibilities to run programs up to 
> 576k (in memory) in conventional memory and the same in expanded memory.
> 
> (The all charge card emulates expanded memory out of extended, and lifts
> the device drivers up in an area above 640 k which is used as extended mem.)

I have an all charge card in one of my machines (Northgate 20 mhz 1 wait
state 80286 "super micro") and have had major problems with the unit
when the system was running a 2372b set at the secondary address (C800)
due to the fact that the machine was running with a VGA monitor.

The ACC worked great when the system was running with the controller
set at the primary address (CC00) when running EGA - but for some reason
the ACC didn't work well with the 2372 installed at C800.
-- 
Larry Snyder              uucp:iuvax!ndcheg!ndmath!nstar!larry
The Northern Star Usenet Distribution Site, Notre Dame, IN USA