Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!ginosko!uunet!mcsun!sunic!dkuug!harald.ruc.dk!jba
From: jba@harald.ruc.dk (Jan B. Andersen)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
Subject: Making shell scripts (was Re: Macro facility in csh?)
Message-ID: <95@harald.UUCP>
Date: 2 Sep 89 15:55:43 GMT
References: <8998@zodiac.ADS.COM> <3117@solo12.cs.vu.nl>
Organization: RUC - Roskilde University Center, Denmark
Lines: 5

My interactive shell is always csh, while most of my scripts
are in Bourne shell. I'm not sure where I read it, but someone
said that the csh is more like an interactive command processor
(the history and substitution mechanism), while the Bourne shell
is an interactive programming language.