Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!ginosko!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!csd4.csd.uwm.edu!bionet!ames!apple!bloom-beacon!EXPO.LCS.MIT.EDU!kit
From: kit@EXPO.LCS.MIT.EDU (Chris D. Peterson)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
Subject: Re: Changing label
Message-ID: <8909051620.AA12776@expo.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: 5 Sep 89 16:20:01 GMT
References: <2192@harrier.ukc.ac.uk>
Sender: daemon@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 16


> I assume then that simply calling XtDispatchEvent() with a faked expose
> event is frowned upon?  Although it works fine in practice, and looks a
> lot cleaner.

Won't that cause a double repaint?  It seems that it makes the code
shorter, but the you will get an additional paint later.  I suppose since
we have bitten the bullet of doing something "ugly" this is a six of one,
half dozen of another sort of arguement.

						Chris D. Peterson     
						MIT X Consortium 

Net:	 kit@expo.lcs.mit.edu
Phone:   (617) 253 - 9608	
Address: MIT - Room NE43-213