Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucsd!ames!sun-barr!texsun!texbell!ssbn!bill From: bill@ssbn.WLK.COM (Bill Kennedy) Newsgroups: news.admin Subject: Re: Franchise Opportunity Summary: What does and doesn't 'belong' Message-ID: <1221@ssbn.WLK.COM> Date: 4 Sep 89 14:30:12 GMT References: <2016@avsd.UUCP> <620438322.3396@ontmoh.UUCP> <960@utoday.UUCP> <630@visdc.UUCP> <967@utoday.UUCP> <119@ubbs-nh.MV.COM> Reply-To: bill@ssbn.UUCP (Bill Kennedy) Distribution: na Organization: W. L. Kennedy Jr. and Associates, Pipe Creek, TX Lines: 37 In article <119@ubbs-nh.MV.COM> noel@ubbs-nh.MV.COM (N. Del More) writes: >In article <967@utoday.UUCP> greenber@utoday.UUCP (Ross M. Greenberg) writes: RMG>>First off, I think it might be best for me to get a biz group set up RMG>>for this kind of stuff: it really doesn't belong here. RMG>>Getting this kinda stuff out of this newsgroup, 'cause it doesn't belong RMG>>here, I look forward to receiving mail telling us where we done good, and RMG>>where we done bad. NDM>Now why in the heck doesn't it belong here? Sounds to me like this was a NDM>discussion about a review published in your rag, and your comments NDM>concerning the editorial policy etc. NDM>IMHO, this discussion IS appropriate for this and other "regular" NDM>newgroups unlike some of your other previous postings. Having just waded through more articles that "don't belong" than those that "do belong", I just gotta drag out the tattered old sermon, sorry... This news group, news.admin is for and about administration of the news network and system. That's what the description has said for as long as I can remember. The content seldom follows the description but the purpose remains the same. Nope, Ross is correct, that discussion _doesn't_ belong in news.admin, but since nobody seems to pay any attention to that, why bitch? From time to time there *is* something posted to this group that pertains to news administration. Those of us who read the group for that purpose must continue to read the inappropriate stuff in order to harvest the occaisional pearl. Something like having to kiss a lot of frogs... Soreheads like me just *have* to bitch about it from time to time in hopes of getting the pertinent stuff closer together. Nope Mr. Moore, you're mistaken. Your article actually invites the dilution I'm complaining about. -- Bill Kennedy usenet {attctc,att,cs.utexas.edu,sun!daver}!ssbn!bill internet bill@ssbn.WLK.COM or attmail!ssbn!bill