Xref: utzoo news.admin:6763 news.misc:3562
Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!xenitec!edhew
From: edhew@xenitec.uucp (Ed Hew)
Newsgroups: news.admin,news.misc
Subject: Re: USENET site admin responsibilities (was: Re: Censorship is for Wusses)
Summary: Answers to Frequently Asked Questions
Message-ID: <1989Sep6.062012.5971@xenitec.uucp>
Date: 6 Sep 89 06:20:12 GMT
References: <19438@gryphon.COM> <4043@buengc.BU.EDU> <1396@redsox.bsw.com> <2870@splut.conmicro.com>
Reply-To: edhew@xenitec.UUCP (Ed Hew)
Followup-To: news.misc
Distribution: na
Organization: Xenitec Consulting Services, Kitchener, ON
Lines: 31

In article <2870@splut.conmicro.com> jay@splut.conmicro.com (Jay "you ignorant splut!" Maynard) writes:

>>This stupid "debate" about "free speech" vs. "ownership rights" gets more
>>tiresome each time it comes up.  Which seems to be about every two months,
>>these days.
>
>I agree. Still, have you noticed that it's always some new
>idiot@somewhere.edu that raises it? Have you also noticed that they get
>precious little support?

I've observed that sysadmin's responsible for their sites tend to
understand this responsibility, while those without any responsibility
would like to tell others what to do with their money/property/charge.
So, what's new?

>This is beginning to sound like something that needs to be added to the
>"commonly asked questions" file.

Yes!  Please!  I can't think of a better way of covering the next
round, sometime around Rememberance day (see previous_patterns).
Spaf.....are you listening.....please.

>Jay Maynard, EMT-P, K5ZC, PP-ASEL   | jay@splut.conmicro.com
>{attctc,bellcore}!texbell!splut!jay

NOTE:	please, followup to news.misc

  Ed. A. Hew       Authorized Technical Trainer        Xeni/Con Corporation
  work:  edhew@xenicon.uucp	 -or-	 ..!{uunet!}utai!lsuc!xenicon!edhew
->home:	 edhew@xenitec.uucp	 -or-	   ..!{uunet!}watmath!xenitec!edhew
  # This posting has absolutely nothing to do with what I do for a living.