Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!iuvax!cica!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!tinman.cis.ohio-state.edu!bob
From: bob@tinman.cis.ohio-state.edu (Bob Sutterfield)
Newsgroups: news.admin
Subject: Re: Tired of bogus subject lines?
Message-ID: <BOB.89Sep11171835@tinman.cis.ohio-state.edu>
Date: 11 Sep 89 21:18:35 GMT
References: <7921@medusa.cs.purdue.edu> <1650@unocss.UUCP>
	<11509@boulder.Colorado.EDU> <6115@ficc.uu.net> <206@loria.crin.fr>
	<1654@unocss.UUCP> <7194@rpi.edu>
Reply-To: Bob Sutterfield <bob@cis.ohio-state.edu>
Organization: The Ohio State University Dept of Computer & Information Science
Lines: 14
In-reply-to: tale@pawl.rpi.edu's message of 11 Sep 89 20:38:24 GMT

In article <7194@rpi.edu> tale@pawl.rpi.edu (David C Lawrence) writes:
   The Path here indicates no immediately apparent foul play.

The only header lines that I could find that might indicate foul play,
when compared to the regularly-scheduled (mechanical?) postings that
came out around 3 Sep 89 22:27:43 GMT, are the uncharacteristically
present Reply-To: and the slight change to Organization:.  Not enough
evidence either way.  And when compared to non-regularly-scheduled
postings like <7792@medusa.cs.purdue.edu>, even those lines look fine,
because the look the same as normal (non-mechanical) discussion.

Note that, textual criticism aside, the issue of whether or not a
particular individual posted an article is immaterial to the morality
of pursuing a course the article might advocate.  We are free {wo}men!