Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.csd.uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!bcstec!jsadler
From: jsadler@bcstec.UUCP (Jim Sadler)
Newsgroups: news.software.notes
Subject: Re: What makes a note "junk"?
Summary: "Junk" notes are notes older than archive days.
Message-ID: <136@bcstec.UUCP>
Date: 6 Sep 89 04:44:08 GMT
References: <410006@teecs.UUCP>
Organization: Boeing Computer Services, Seattle
Lines: 18

In article <410006@teecs.UUCP>, belkin@teecs.UUCP (Hershel Belkin) writes:
> I have another notes question which has been bothering me:
> 
> We seem to be getting a lot of notes ending up in "junk", but I don't
> know why!  If I look at the headers, they look OK.  Many are NOT
. 
.
.
> 
> (I'd hate to think of MY notes ending up there... :-)

If memory serves me right "junk" notes are articles older than "Archive days"
which is set in the config file.  I believe the default is 14 days.  You 
could change it to 20 days.  The disadvantage is that you would need more 
storage for more notes and the older notes.
 
 jim sadler
 uunet!bcstec!jsadler or jsadler@bcstec.boeing.com (<-I think it works)