Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!udel!princeton!phoenix!harnad From: harnad@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (S. R. Harnad) Newsgroups: comp.ai Subject: Visual Search & Complexity: BBS Call for Commentators Keywords: computer vision, complexity theory, perception, neurophysiology Message-ID: <10491@phoenix.Princeton.EDU> Date: 19 Sep 89 05:40:16 GMT Organization: Princeton University, NJ Lines: 41 Below is the abstract of a forthcoming target article to appear in Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS), an international, interdisciplinary journal that provides Open Peer Commentary on important and controversial current research in the biobehavioral and cognitive sciences. Commentators must be current BBS Associates or nominated by a current BBS Associate. To be considered as a commentator on this article, to suggest other appropriate commentators, or for information about how to become a BBS Associate, please send email to: harnad@princeton.edu or write to: BBS, 20 Nassau Street, #240, Princeton NJ 08542 [tel: 609-921-7771] ____________________________________________________________________ Analyzing Vision at the Complexity Level John K. Tsotsos Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto and The Canadian Institute for Advanced Research The general problem of visual search can be shown to be computationally intractable in a formal complexity-theoretic sense, yet visual search is widely involved in everyday perception and biological systems manage to perform it remarkably well. Complexity level analysis may resolve this contradiction. Visual search can be reshaped into tractability through approximations and by optimizing the resources devoted to visual processing. Architectural constraints can be derived using the minimum cost principle to rule out a large class of potential solutions. The evidence speaks strongly against purely bottom-up approaches to vision. This analysis of visual search performance in terms of task-directed influences on visual information processing and complexity satisfaction allows a large body of neurophysiological and psychological evidence to be tied together. -- Stevan Harnad INTERNET: harnad@confidence.princeton.edu harnad@princeton.edu srh@flash.bellcore.com harnad@elbereth.rutgers.edu harnad@princeton.uucp CSNET: harnad%confidence.princeton.edu@relay.cs.net BITNET: harnad1@umass.bitnet harnad@pucc.bitnet (609)-921-7771