Newsgroups: comp.dsp Path: utzoo!henry From: henry@utzoo.uucp (Henry Spencer) Subject: Re: Communicating DSP Equations (was: Re: DSP textbook) Message-ID: <1989Sep24.032009.11720@utzoo.uucp> Organization: U of Toronto Zoology References: <1989Sep20.195449.3833x@ivucsb.sba.ca.us> <7070001@hpnmdla.HP.COM> <459@eedsp.gatech.edu> <668@suntops.Tops.Sun.COM> <19237@gatech.edu> Date: Sun, 24 Sep 89 03:20:09 GMT In article <19237@gatech.edu> ken@gatech.UUCP (Ken Seefried III) writes: >Personally, I would advocate TeX/LaTeX for communicating equations. >It has the advantage of running on a vast number of horribly baroque >machines, having a wide array of output drivers and, most importantly, >it is relatively readable in unprocessed form, unlike something like >postscript or eqn. Uh, agreed about postscript, but somebody has misinformed you about eqn. TeX's math notation is a LESS-readable clone of eqn (more or less). See related posting. -- "Where is D.D. Harriman now, | Henry Spencer at U of Toronto Zoology when we really *need* him?" | uunet!attcan!utzoo!henry henry@zoo.toronto.edu