Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!purdue!mentor.cc.purdue.edu!pur-ee!pur-phy!maxwell.physics.purdue.edu!sho
From: sho@maxwell.physics.purdue.edu (Sho Kuwamoto)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: C++ for DOS/OS2
Message-ID: <2560@pur-phy>
Date: 16 Sep 89 22:03:55 GMT
References: <657@windy.dsir.govt.nz> <2053@avsd.UUCP>
Sender: news@pur-phy
Reply-To: sho@maxwell.physics.purdue.edu.UUCP (Sho Kuwamoto)
Organization: Purdue Univ. Physics Dept., W. Lafayette, IN
Lines: 15

In article <2053@avsd.UUCP> daniel@avsd.UUCP (Daniel Edelson) writes:
>In article <657@windy.dsir.govt.nz> SRWMRBD@windy.dsir.govt.nz (ROBERT) writes:
>>>Joe English writes
>>>Zortech sells a good C++ compiler for MS-DOS at...
>>>...but it does support everything in The Book.  
>>[...]
>Also no pointers to members. No reasonable way to take the address of a 
>member function. [...]

So, what does (or should) it mean to take the address of a non static
member function?

-Sho
--
sho@physics.purdue.edu  <<-- just wonderin.