Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!cbmvax!snark!eric
From: eric@snark.uu.net (Eric S. Raymond)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Standards and such (WAS: Re: Inlining -- what happened to the inline keyword)
Message-ID: <1Snt4x#5XpYRh=eric@snark.uu.net>
Date: 15 Sep 89 06:03:32 GMT
References: <4783@uhccux.uhcc.hawaii.edu> <2121@dataio.Data-IO.COM> <11032@smoke.BRL.MIL> <2127@dataio.Data-IO.COM> <3025@quanta.eng.ohio-state.edu>
Lines: 7

In <3025@quanta.eng.ohio-state.edu> Rob Carriere wrote:
> Of the few languages I know, none were obsolete at the moment of their
> standardization.  Can you supply a concrete example?

ISO Pascal.
-- 
      Eric S. Raymond = eric@snark.uu.net    (mad mastermind of TMN-Netnews)