Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!milano!rcp
From: rcp@milano.sw.mcc.com (Rob Pettengill)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Subject: Re: CLOS: is it OOP?
Message-ID: <31041@milano.sw.mcc.com>
Date: 20 Sep 89 15:57:23 GMT
References: <19582@mimsy.UUCP> <29564@news.Think.COM> <11815@polya.Stanford.EDU> <1989Sep16.221107.22750@odi.com>
Reply-To: rcp@milano.sw.mcc.com.UUCP (Rob Pettengill)
Distribution: usa
Organization: MCC, Austin, Texas
Lines: 16

One reason for not including encapsulation directly in CLOS, is that
Common Lisp already has a generic encapsulation mechanism: the package
system.  

;rob 

  Robert C. Pettengill, MCC Software Technology Program
  P. O. Box 200195, Austin, Texas  78720
  ARPA:  rcp@mcc.com            PHONE:  (512) 338-3533
  UUCP:  ..!cs.utexas.edu!milano!rcp

-- 
  Robert C. Pettengill, MCC Software Technology Program
  P. O. Box 200195, Austin, Texas  78720
  ARPA:  rcp@mcc.com            PHONE:  (512) 338-3533
  UUCP:  ..!cs.utexas.edu!milano!rcp