Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!watmath!iuvax!cica!gatech!udel!mmdf From: LISTSERV%DEARN.BITNET@cunyvm.cuny.edu (1.5o) Newsgroups: comp.os.minix Subject: File: "MINIX-L MAIL" being sent to you Message-ID: <24565@louie.udel.EDU> Date: 21 Sep 89 20:08:25 GMT Lines: 40 Received: from DFNGATE.BITNET by DEARN.BITNET.DBP.DE (Mailer R2.03B) with BSMTP id 8510; Thu, 21 Sep 89 22:07:14 ESZ Received: by DFNGATE (Mailer R2.03) id 7432; Thu, 21 Sep 89 22:06:13 MSZ Date: Thu, 21 Sep 89 22:08 CET To: MINIX-L@DEARN.BITNET From: SCHIERS@IMDM.UKE.UNI-HAMBURG.DBP.DE Subject: Re:nroff problems Comments: +++ Changed X.430-Header: +++ x FROM: "Carsten Schiers" x TO: x MESSAGE ID: ;134 x BODY TYPE: IA5TEXT Hi there, in a recent article I wrote: >I tried to compile nroff as posted by ast. I put the macro in the >directory, I specified in the nroff.h file. I am using MINIX/ST. >Then I started: > > # nroff -man nroff.1 > >and got a: > > sig=11 to pid=20 at pc=133a0e > memory fault > >I did a chmem =80000 /usr/bin/nroff, but had the same effect. Sorry for that, I now read the bug report from Chris about the initialisation to NULL in nroff1.c, and it seems, that this is a problem in the ST implementation. CU Carsten. +-----------------------------+----------------------------------------+ Carsten Schiers University of Hamburg, F.R. of Germany schiers@ University Hospital Eppendorf imdm.uke.uni-hamburg.dbp.de Dept. of Computer Science in Medicine +-----------------------------+----------------------------------------+