Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!A.ISI.EDU!LYNCH From: LYNCH@A.ISI.EDU (Dan Lynch) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip Subject: Re: DoD --> CMOT and SNMP Message-ID: <12526341449.22.LYNCH@A.ISI.EDU> Date: 15 Sep 89 04:48:41 GMT References: <8909071738.AA04966@trwind.ind.TRW.COM> Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The Internet Lines: 35 Robert, I've been away, so sorry for a late reply, but I have also had a chance to see other replies and must add my two cents worth. OSI stands for Open Systems Interconnection. ISO stands for International Organization for Standardization. (Yes, I know that the English/American abbreviation for that should be IOS, but it ain't that way this time...) OSi describes a model of communication among consenting systems. It was described in an ISO document many years ago. Then ISO committees began to fill out thier interpretations of how to accomplish the lofty goals of the OSI model. All of those "interpretations" have come aout as ISO documents. It is easy to mix the two acronyms up because of their use of the same alphabet symbols. I used to find it useful to make the distinction batween OSI and OSI. I thought (and still do think) that the TCP/IP suite of protocols are quite in line withthe OSI "model". So is DECNET, so is SNA, etc. (I mean, hey, an application has just got to shove the bits out the "right" interface/wire to an equally receptive application at the target system; how many ways can you describe to do that? In 1976 it was an accomplishment to even make that description. By this tim ein history it is a freshman problem, right?) So, today, we should quit splitting haris, and let the meaning of "OSI" be those protocols that are promulgated by ISO with regard to communications between consenting computers. (ISO also sets standards for cement ingredients, numbers of threads per inch/millimeter for screws, etc...) In other words, it is a waste of energy for someone to say they are OSI complinat unless they use the actual ISO protocols. We technologists may be able to sort his all out, but our customers should not have to sort out our internal debates. Let us let them see one label. That label is OSI. Dan -------