Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!A.ISI.EDU!LYNCH From: LYNCH@A.ISI.EDU (Dan Lynch) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip Subject: RE: DOD ---> CMOT VERSUS SNMP Message-ID: <12526830980.22.LYNCH@A.ISI.EDU> Date: 17 Sep 89 01:37:45 GMT References: <8909161044.AA02913@venera.isi.edu> Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The Internet Lines: 40 Rodney, Your last message got me to feel guilty about my earlier reply. Sometimes those of us who "know the answers" don't realize how those who are asking the questions are essentially so far removed from all the stupid insider knowledge that our answers seem very opaque. I will try to answer your questions directly. CMOT is an acronym for CMip Over Tcp. (I lowercased stuff to make the point.) CMIP is the ISO protocol for network management. CMOT is a design that allows the ISO CMIP applications to manage objects on a TCP/IP network as well as on an ISO network. (At least thats the goal statement.) I do not know of any official DoD policy stating that SNMP and/or CMOT is the preferred/required network management protocol. The IAB (Internet Activities Board), of which I am a member, has stated that either protocol is acceptable as a network management protocol and that entities that wish to be network manageable must implement at least one of those protocols. The history of this situation is a longish one, but essentially SNMP was viewed as a stopgap measure (albeit an excellent one) for network management and that CMOT was a long term measure that would incorporate the ISO network entities that are in our future. The current situation in the marketplace is that there are dozens of SNMP implementations out there. To date, I know of no CMOT implementations that are offered as commercial products. A year ago there was a demonstration of CMOT prototypes at a technical conference. The distance from a prototype to a product is sometimes large, eh? My conclusion from this is that of someone is telling you that CMOT is mandatory for a certain equipment buy, then you are probably being lied to. If you are not being lied to, then whoever set the requirement is not in tune with product avaiability and the spec should be redone. (I'm assuming this is for a product that someone wants to install this year or next...) Dan Lynch Advanced Computing Environments 415-941-3399 -------