Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!att!cbnewsc!bwf
From: bwf@cbnewsc.ATT.COM (bernard.w.fecht)
Newsgroups: comp.realtime
Subject: Re: 80c51 vs. 68hc11
Keywords: realtime, 8051, 68hc11
Message-ID: <3140@cbnewsc.ATT.COM>
Date: 13 Sep 89 17:58:59 GMT
References: <2316@optilink.UUCP>
Reply-To: bwf@cbnewsc.ATT.COM (bernard.w.fecht,ih,)
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 13

In article <2316@optilink.UUCP> elliott@optilink.UUCP (Paul Elliott x225) writes:
>

>                  There are several c compilers for the 68HC11; we evaluated 
>a handfull and found that the code generated ranged from pretty good to 
>absolutely horrible (I can follow up on this if you are interested).
>
>--Paul
>

Please do...

Bill