Xref: utzoo comp.sources.bugs:1948 comp.sources.d:4074
Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!att!cbnews!cbema!las
From: cbema!las@cbnews.ATT.COM (cbema!las)
Newsgroups: comp.sources.bugs,comp.sources.d
Subject: Re: pcomm 1.1 patch 9
Message-ID: <9648@cbnews.ATT.COM>
Date: 20 Sep 89 16:53:53 GMT
References: <184@megasys.COM>
Reply-To: cbema!las@cbnews.ATT.COM (Larry A. Shurr,20650,cb,9a110,6148605851)
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Columbus, OH (actually an AGS consultant)
Lines: 20

In article <184@megasys.COM> pax@megasys.COM (Garry M. Paxinos) writes:
}In article <1989Sep16.132728.7315@trevan.uucp> trevor@trevan.uucp (Trevor J. Harris) writes:

}   Please could someone mail me this patch and any others after patch 10.

}I would appreciate it if someone could point me to a distribuition point
}for all patches to pcomm 1.1.  Thanks!

Is there some reason to be using pcomm 1.1 in preference to 1.2?  (Just
curious).  I replaced my 1.1 with 1.2, including patch sets 1 - 4, some
time ago.

BTW: Good work Emmet!

regards, Larry
-- 
Signed: Larry A. Shurr (cbema!las@att.ATT.COM or att!cbema!las)
Clever signature, Wonderful wit, Outdo the others, Be a big hit! - Burma Shave
(With apologies to the real thing.  The above represents my views only.)
(Please note my mailing address.  Mail sent directly to cbnews doesn't make it.)