Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!pasteur!zooey.Berkeley.EDU!c162-de
From: c162-de@zooey.Berkeley.EDU (David Navas)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Subject: Re: ARexx psuedo-random number generator
Keywords: ARexx Random Number Generator
Message-ID: <17117@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: 13 Sep 89 00:30:52 GMT
References: <19504@unix.cis.pitt.edu>
Sender: news@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU
Reply-To: c162-de@zooey.Berkeley.EDU.UUCP (David Navas)
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
Lines: 14

In article <19504@unix.cis.pitt.edu> ejkst@unix.cis.pitt.edu (Eric J. Kennedy) writes:
>All the program does is calculate 10000 pseudo-random numbers, and do a
>histogram of sorts.  
Hmmm, yeah.  Well, in one of the 'miga rags is an article on random numbers --
including Arexx random numbers.  The conclusion was that the Arexx random
number generator was really poor.  [Unless staying up all night, and then
being caught in a lab fire totally threw me for a loop and I don't remember
what I'm talking about :-)]

>Eric Kennedy
>ejkst@cis.unix.pitt.edu

David Navas
c162-de@zooey