Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!agate!eris.berkeley.edu!mwm From: mwm@eris.berkeley.edu (Mike (I'll think of something yet) Meyer) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech Subject: Re: Links Keywords: Link are good. Message-ID: <1989Sep22.073801.29297@agate.berkeley.edu> Date: 22 Sep 89 07:38:01 GMT References: <8909180737.AA29741@postgres.Berkeley.EDU> <1989Sep18.210925.5543@NCoast.ORG> <3163@abaa.UUCP> Sender: usenet@agate.berkeley.edu (USENET Administrator;;;;ZU44) Reply-To: mwm@eris.berkeley.edu (Mike (I'll think of something yet) Meyer) Organization: Missionaria Phonibalonica Lines: 19 In article <1989Sep18.210925.5543@NCoast.ORG> davewt@ncoast.ORG (David Wright) writes: > Well, that IS the obvious way, but it still requires that the OS >be patched to handle links, which is just another place for a bug to >creep in. And for a fairly unimportant feature at that... Gee, people were telling me what great stuff ARP was, because it saved - what, 40 or 50K? As a conservative estimate, links would save me ~400K on a single project. From that perspective, links are an order of magnitude more important than getting an ARP-like facilitiy into 1.4.