Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ncar!husc6!m2c!wpi!greyelf From: greyelf@wpi.wpi.edu (Michael J Pender) Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple Subject: Re: DoubleDOS Message-ID: <4109@wpi.wpi.edu> Date: 19 Sep 89 19:24:03 GMT References: <8909111833.aa06256@SMOKE.BRL.MIL> <852@madnix.UUCP> Reply-To: greyelf@wpi.wpi.edu (Michael J Pender) Distribution: usa Organization: Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA. USA Lines: 34 In article <852@madnix.UUCP> rat@madnix.UUCP (David Douthitt) writes: > >CHRIS@MSUS1.BITNET wrote: >| >| Is anyone familiar with any type of program which is similar to the IBM's >| [DoubleDOS] ? For those of you who don't know what Double DOS is, it was a >| program loaded into ram which allowed you to split the CPU (you could flip >| between two different programs). > >You could try Extra K (from Beagle Brothers) or SoftSwitch (from Roger >Wagner). Extra K makes your IIc or IIe look like two 64K Apples. >Softswitch makes your IIgs look like numerous Apples. It should be noted that extra K will run on a IIe, IIc, or Laser 128 also. I've been meaning to look into getting Daemon to actually run two seperate programs at the same time, one in each half of memory. It wouldn't be too different than running background tasks. Has anyone ever written one of these programs that runs a program in the other bank and switches? I figure those of us with 2.0 Megahertz or faster speed should still have acceptable speed. Also I did some more work on Daemon and the Window routines over the summer, but have been too busy lately to upload them. The window routines still have a bug or two I haven't killed, but as my parents keep reminding me, I'm at college to pass courses, not write software. Anywho, I should have somethin up in the next week, but don't hold me to it. --- Michael J Pender Jr Box 1942 c/o W.P.I. I wrote SHELL and Daemon, greyelf@wpi.bitnet 100 Institute Rd. send bug reports, suggestions, greyelf@wpi.wpi.edu Worcester, Ma 01609 checks to me.