Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcsun!ukc!newcastle.ac.uk!tadhg!chris From: chris@tadhg.newcastle.ac.uk (Chris Forker - Nav Arch-) Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st Subject: Re: adding a 68881 Message-ID: <1989Sep14.084139.17332@newcastle.ac.uk> Date: 14 Sep 89 08:41:39 GMT References: <8909131852.a027631@nabla.electrical-engineering.umist.ac.uk> Sender: news@newcastle.ac.uk Organization: /etc/organization Lines: 68 I have a board with a 68881 produced by Atari in my Mega. You did not state what machine you have. I got my board from Silica Shop about a year ago for 107 pounds sterling ( ed discount ). If you don't have a Mega, you could consider one of the accelerator boards with a slot to take the 68881. Try Power Computing, or Third Coast Tech. BTW, Pro. Fortran with the 68881 flies. Not much slower on the savage benchmark than a Sun 3/50. The following benchmarks where obtanined using Pro. Pascal. TEST Fib Float Sieve Savage ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ No. Iter. 100 10,000 100 25,000 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Atari ST 303.93 52.06 57.23 518.60 Atari ST (1) 303.93 12.42 57.23 6.37 Mac SE 264.00 229.98 64.70 1884.30 Sun 3/50 * 88 17 10 254 Sun 3/50 (2) 135 2 10 5 Sun 3/60 * 57 11 7 161 Sun 3/60 (3) 94 2 7 4 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Sun 386i + 125 14 27 179 Sun 386i (4) 124 1 27 16 IBM PS/2 50 + 258 28 60 365 IBM PS/2 70 + 140 16 29 200 IBM ATx + 324 35 74 458 IBM ATx (5) 317 11 75 31 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ( ALL times are in seconds ) *:Sun Unix Release 3.5 ( Pascal -no optimization, multi-user, & fsoft) 1:MC68000 @ 8Mhz + MC68881 @ 16Mhz 2:MC68020 @ 15.5Mhz + MC68881 @ 15.5Mhz 3:MC68020 @ 20Mhz + MC68881 @ 20Mhz 2 & 3 used the -f68881 option instead of -fsoft. +:No maths co-processor 4:80387 @ 16Mhz ( I think. The 386i is the 150 variant ) 5:80287 @ 10Mhz All times obtained using the DOS version of Pro. Pascal on IBM's & Sun 386i. 386i was in DOS mode. The time for the Mac SE was found in the July 87 ( I think ) issue of BYTE in an article on benchmarking machines. The same Pascal code was used on all the machines. Although different timing methods were employed in software for each different architecture. The above figures are given in good faith. As with all benchmarks you only get what you want to see. +-=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--+--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--+ | mail: Chris.Forker@newcastle.ac.uk | Dept. Marine Technology | | voice: +44 91 2226000 X 6750 | Newcastle University | | fax: +44 91 2611182 | Newcastle upon Tyne | | | NE1 7RU ENGLAND | +-=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--+--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--+