Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!microsoft!w-darekm From: w-darekm@microsoft.UUCP (Darek Mihocka) Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st Subject: Re: Graphics file formats on new machines Message-ID: <7728@microsoft.UUCP> Date: 17 Sep 89 21:25:32 GMT References: <2600003@hprnd.HP.COM> <7677@microsoft.UUCP> <3104@brahma.cs.hw.ac.uk> Reply-To: w-darekm@microsoft.UUCP (Darek Mihocka) Organization: Microsoft Corp., Redmond WA Lines: 31 In article <3104@brahma.cs.hw.ac.uk> neil@cs.hw.ac.uk (Neil Forsyth) writes: > >There IS provision in the Neochrome header for different screen sizes although >in current versions of the program it is not used. > >I personally like the Neochrome format and although it only supports low rez >just now the first long in the header is the rez. I wasn't aware that Neochrome supports variable resolutions. Somebody actually thought ahead was back in 1985? :-) I have also received some email about the IMG format also supporting variable resolution. The question still remains, what format will Atari and/or developers decide to make the standard on the new machines (and Hyperscreen modified STs)? Or will this be a wait and see situation? And how with the Getrez() function work on the new machines? > >Nope. Degas Elite uses bit 15 in the rez word to signify a compressed image >.PCx. > ok, then, make it bit 14. :-) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Darek Mihocka ST Xformer II CIS: (out of order) Box 2624, Station B Quick Utilities GEnie: DAREKM Kitchener, Ontario MegaBlit SSG SPX DELPHI: DAREKM N2H 6N2 Shareware, not Vaporware BIX: darekm Canada Blitter chip sucks! CheapNet: ...!uw-beaver!microsoft!w-darekm (519)-747-0386 A mind is a terrible thing to waste, so JUST SAY NO TO TOS. Opinions expressed are my own and not those of anyone not named Darek Mihocka. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------