Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!zephyr.ens.tek.com!tekcrl!tekgvs!toma
From: toma@tekgvs.LABS.TEK.COM (Tom Almy)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: MSJ review of programming editors
Keywords: Microsoft program editor
Message-ID: <5938@tekgvs.LABS.TEK.COM>
Date: 15 Sep 89 13:56:52 GMT
References: <2000@hudson.acc.virginia.edu>
Reply-To: toma@tekgvs.LABS.TEK.COM (Tom Almy)
Organization: Tektronix, Inc., Beaverton,  OR.
Lines: 19

In article <2000@hudson.acc.virginia.edu> jvb7u@astsun1.astro.Virginia.EDU (Jon Brinkmann) writes:
[...]
> They reviewed in depth:
>
>			BRIEF
>			ME (from Magma Software Systems, not Multi-Edit!)
>			VEDIT PLUS
>			UNIPRESS EMACS
>			KEDIT

Well I really hate to get involved with another Editor War, but it doesn't
seem to be a very comprehensive review if they are going to leave out Epsilon.
From the discussions here, it looks like the two favorite editors are Brief
and Epsilon.

Tom Almy
toma@tekgvs.labs.tek.com
Standard Disclaimers Apply
I use Epsilon (or couldn't you guess?)