Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!ingr!phil From: phil@ingr.com (Phil Johnson) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.rt Subject: Re: AIX Peculiarities Message-ID: <6509@ingr.com> Date: 21 Sep 89 17:41:57 GMT References: <2534@shaffer.UUCP> <1989Sep5.193948.14894@sun.soe.clarkson.edu> Reply-To: phil@ingr.UUCP (Phil Johnson) Organization: Intergraph Corp. Huntsville, Al Lines: 48 In article <1989Sep5.193948.14894@sun.soe.clarkson.edu> abstine@image.soe.clarkson.edu (Arthur Stine) writes: >From article <2534@shaffer.UUCP>, by jon@shaffer.UUCP (Jon Doran/60000): >> In article <16655@ut-emx.UUCP>, nghiem@walt.cc.utexas.edu (Alex Nghiem) writes: -- stuff deleted -- >> OK, so IBM is not winning any popularity contests. And I agree >> that there is plenty of room for improvement... But IBM is >> ranked 4th in workstation sales. I'm not sure if this is by >> unit or by sales. >> 1. HP (includes Apollo Div) >> 2. Sun >> 3. ??? >> 4. IBM >> >the ??? would be DEC. The percentage of installed systems that I've seen >mentioned in recent trade-rags in something like: > >1 HP/Apollo = > 30% >2 Sun ~ 30% >3 DEC ~ 23% >4 IBM ~ 2% > The current ranking of U.S. workstation vendors for the 1988-89 analysis period is as follows: NOTE - 1) These rankings are restricted to Workstation products. 2) Nnumbers in parenthesies denote the ranking, for a specific category, that differs from the general ranking (Installed based). Installed Units Revenues Base Shipped (Equipment/services) 1. Sun 128,000 33.1% 69,000 37.2% $1,462 M 32.7% 2. Apollo 83,010 21.5% (3) 29,010 15.6% (4) $ 654 M 14.6% 3. DEC 72,500 18.8% (2) 41,600 22.4% $ 993 M 20.9% 4. HP 54,200 14.0% 24,275 13.1% (3) $ 669 M 15.0% 5. Intergraph 17,727 4.1% 9,895 5.3% $ 329 M 7.4% 6. SGI 12,105 3.1% 4,555 2.5% $ 199 M 4.5% 7. IBM 8,500 2.2% 3,900 2.1% $ 82 M 1.8% -- Philip E. Johnson UUCP: usenet!ingr!b3!sys_7a!phil MY words, VOICE: (205) 772-2497 MY opinion!