Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ukma!husc6!endor!siegel
From: siegel@endor.harvard.edu (Rich Siegel)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer
Subject: Re: Is THINK C 4.0 ANSI compatible?
Message-ID: <2621@husc6.harvard.edu>
Date: 14 Sep 89 22:04:39 GMT
References: <336@castle.ed.ac.uk> <13519@well.UUCP> <6494@columbia.edu> <2614@husc6.harvard.edu> <8404@boring.cwi.nl>
Sender: news@husc6.harvard.edu
Reply-To: siegel@endor.UUCP (Rich Siegel)
Organization: Symantec Language Products Group
Lines: 19

In article <8404@boring.cwi.nl> jurjen@cwi.nl (Jurjen N.E. Bos) writes:
>But, as far as I know, THINK 4.0 _does_ compile ANSI C, isn't it?

	Yes, except for "const" and "volatile" and some other things that
slip my mind; nevertheless, THINK C 4.0 is more conformant than a number 
of C compilers that claim ANSI conformance.

R>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 Rich Siegel
 Staff Software Developer
 Symantec Corporation, Language Products Group
 Internet: siegel@endor.harvard.edu
 UUCP: ..harvard!endor!siegel

"There is no personal problem which cannot be solved by sufficient
application of high explosives."

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~