Xref: utzoo comp.text:4959 comp.text.desktop:905
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!uhccux!munnari.oz.au!murtoa.cs.mu.oz.au!otc!metro!bunyip!uqvax!ccmiguel
From: ccmiguel@uqvax.decnet.uq.oz
Newsgroups: comp.text,comp.text.desktop
Subject: Re: Which is better?  Textprocessing langs or DeskTop publishing pgms?
Message-ID: <5258@uqvax.decnet.uq.oz>
Date: 11 Sep 89 08:36:35 GMT
References: <509@mjbtn.MFEE.TN.US> <2650@trantor.harris-atd.com>
Organization: University Of Queensland
Lines: 25

In article <2650@trantor.harris-atd.com>, chuck@melmac.harris-atd.com (Chuck Musciano) writes:
>      I am an unabashed Frame fan, but InterLeaf is loaded with features.
> Its interface leaves a lot to be desired, and it can be really expensive
> for the full system.  I would suggest that you get demo tapes from the
> "big three" (Frame, InterLeaf, and Publisher) and give them a try.  Each
> has a certain niche, and you should try to find your niche before arbitrarily
		^^^^^
> picking a tool.
> 


I would be very interested if you could describe those "niches"
in more detail. I like The Publisher but don't know how it measures
up against Frame and Interleaf. Please?

----------------------------------------------------------
Miguel Peirano  

Prentice Computer Centre - University of Queensland
ST LUCIA QLD 4067, AUSTRALIA - Phone +61 (07) 377-4169
			     - FAX   +61 (07) 371-8380

	ccmiguel@uqvax.decnet.uq.oz
UUCP	...!seismo!munnari!uqvax.decnet.uq.oz!ccmiguel
----------------------------------------------------------