Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!ames!apple!agate!shelby!portia!forel!karish From: karish@forel.stanford.edu (Chuck Karish) Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions Subject: Re: AIX (is it unix)? Summary: Yes. Message-ID: <5347@portia.Stanford.EDU> Date: 15 Sep 89 20:01:39 GMT References: <1702@naucse.UUCP> Sender: USENET News System Reply-To: karish@forel.stanford.edu (Chuck Karish) Organization: Mindcraft, Inc. Lines: 32 [ Oh, wonderful! More gratuitous IBM-bashing! ] In article ehrlich@cs.psu.edu (Daniel Ehrlich) wrote: >In article <1702@naucse.UUCP> jdc@naucse.UUCP (John Campbell) writes: > Slightly more reasonably, he further suggested we could purchase > AIX and run it as a "virtual machine" under VM. > I know nothing of IBM. Is this reasonable? Is AIX a real unix when it > runs on a big IBM? Specifically, would Sun/Iris/Apollo users understand > the IBM world if they came in through the AIX back door? (And does > *anyone* know how good a TCP/IP internet running on ethernet implementation > will be for such users?) >AIX V2 (Advanced Interactive Executive) has roots in UNIX System V >Release 3 (I think). The original port (AIX 1.0) to the RT was from SysVR2. The PS/2 version, and, I believe, the 370 hosted version, are based on 4.3BSD. The user interface draws from both worlds. My understanding is that by the time 3.0 is released, all three platforms will be running the same code. >Some people believe it is UNIX. I do not. It >is sufficiently different from what I have been using for the last 10 >years (BSD UNIX and it's derivatives) that I find AIX painful to use. This says that it's not BSD, not that it's not UNIX. Adapting from AIX to SunOS should be no harder than adapting from SunOS to the Apollo's system(s). Chuck Karish karish@mindcraft.com (415) 493-9000 karish@forel.stanford.edu