Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!sun-barr!decwrl!gilroy.pa.dec.com!klee
From: klee@gilroy.pa.dec.com (Ken Lee)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
Subject: Re: Problems building GNU Emacs with DECwindows
Message-ID: <1809@bacchus.dec.com>
Date: 13 Sep 89 17:37:58 GMT
References: <8909130047.AA05734@lorax.umiacs.UMD.EDU> <2684@orion.cf.uci.edu>
Sender: news@decwrl.dec.com
Lines: 13

In article <8909130047.AA05734@lorax.umiacs.UMD.EDU>, jsw@UMIACS.UMD.EDU writes:
> Why does DEC define calloc (and some other memory allocation funcs) in 
> libX11.a ?  The libX11.a has malloc defined (external text) in XvmsAlloc.o
> in libX11.a and calloc defined in XvmsCalloc.o in libX11.a ? 

DEC's Ultrix libX11.a has it's memory functions because these are much
faster than the libc routines.  If you're not interested, remove these
2 files from the libX11.a archive.

Ken Lee
DEC Western Software Laboratory, Palo Alto, Calif.
Internet: klee@decwrl.dec.com
uucp: uunet!decwrl!klee