Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!husc6!paperboy!osf!dbrooks From: dbrooks@osf.osf.org (David Brooks) Newsgroups: comp.windows.x Subject: Re: The OSF is *what*? Message-ID: <894@paperboy.OSF.ORG> Date: 16 Sep 89 13:42:08 GMT References: <8909130635.AA29672@Larry.McRCIM.McGill.EDU> <8909131235.AA13992@fnord.umiacs.UMD.EDU> <1989Sep16.054622.21479@alembic.acs.com> Sender: news@OSF.ORG Reply-To: dbrooks@osf.org (David Brooks) Organization: Open Software Foundation Lines: 55 I wasn't going to react in public to all this, preferring to let it work itself out (also, I prefer to coordinate with my colleagues before posting, and it's now Saturday), but the referenced article needs one particular immediate correction. (I diffidently apologize for excessive diffidence). In article <1989Sep16.054622.21479@alembic.acs.com> csu@alembic.acs.com (Dave Mack) writes: [...] (during, mostly, a factually correct and well-balanced description of our process) >I think you have excessive expectations regarding what the Open Software >Foundation is all about. The OSF products are "open" to OSF members. You >plunk down your twenty-five grand for membership, then you're entitled >to buy the Motif source for a grand, and presumably use it in your products. Source is available to *anyone*, as of last July 21. >(I haven't read the OSF License Agreement - I hope someone from OSF will >correct me if I'm wrong.) I understand that binary copies are available >for fifty bucks or thereabouts, although I don't know if you have to be >an OSF member to get those also. Binaries, which will allow you to build Motif applications without Motif source, will come from your favorite platform vendor or independent software vendor. >While the conversation I had did not deal with context diffs, the warning >I got strongly suggests that posting diffs would not be appreciated by >the OSF legal staff. The gentleman I spoke to gave me e-mail addresses >for some mailing lists specifically for the transmission of bug reports >and patches. I'm slightly hesitant to post the addresses - send e-mail >if you want them. As noted, anyone with a source license has source *and* access to our support mailing lists; we handle support both by phone and electronically. Diffs have, in fact, been a significant component of such lists during the open development process and have been of help to improve the quality of Motif. If you have a license, you have access to the lists; if you don't, you don't need it. What I'm trying to say, gently, is: please don't ask Dave Mack for the lists. (Unless, of course, you have one of the many bootleg copies out there :-) btw, it was due to such interaction with early licensees that the original problem posted by Dave was addressed several moons ago. -- David Brooks dbrooks@osf.org Open Software Foundation uunet!osf.org!dbrooks 11 Cambridge Center (My views, and OSF's, though I didn't Cambridge, MA 02142, USA actually show this to my boss) "Is this heaven?" "No, it's Massachusetts." -- Field of Dreams (paraphrase)