Path: utzoo!censor!geac!jtsv16!uunet!bloom-beacon!UMIACS.UMD.EDU!steve From: steve@UMIACS.UMD.EDU Newsgroups: comp.windows.x Subject: Re: The OSF is *what*? Message-ID: <8909181323.AA28785@fnord.umiacs.UMD.EDU> Date: 18 Sep 89 13:23:24 GMT References: <894@paperboy.OSF.ORG> Organization: The Internet Lines: 32 I know about OSF membership. I was one of the people here who suggested that we (sound of switching hats from UMIACS to the CS Department) join. We've been members since March-ish. (It's worth noting in passing that academic memberships don't cost $25K. They're more like $5K or less, though I no longer remember the exact figure.) I also know what has to be done to get Motif source. My comments, past and present, about Motif source availability are known. If there is a list for Motif fixes, and if *everyone* on that list sees *all* the fixes that are sent to that list (i.e., it's not just a bugfix repository like sunbugs@sun.com or 4bsd-bugs@okeeffe.berkeley.edu), that will mostly solve the problem of access to fixes. My only fear in this case is that the readership still isn't wide enough. For example, would I be allowed on the Motif bugfix list, even though I'm not listed as the official technical contact for UMCP CSD's membership with OSF? The issue of disallowing the posting of Motif diffs to public lists or newsgroups still strikes me (in the absence of further information; I'd like OSF to speak up and clarify) as unnecessarily paranoid, and perhaps downright fascist. I agree with Barry Shein's suggestion -- perhaps if OSF wants to flex legal muscles, it should try to clean up the copyright laws, rather than giving in to them. Stupid laws deserve to be struck down. Now back to your regularly scheduled technical discussion... -Steve (mouthing off for myself again, and not for any of the organizations I might work for or deal with) Spoken: Steve Miller Domain: steve@umiacs.umd.edu UUCP: uunet!mimsy!steve Phone: +1-301-454-1808 USPS: UMIACS, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742