Xref: utzoo news.groups:12375 news.misc:3619
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!tale
From: tale@pawl.rpi.edu (David C Lawrence)
Newsgroups: news.groups,news.misc
Subject: Re: Report Card on the success of the group creation guidelines
Message-ID: <1989Sep20.060201.4473@rpi.edu>
Date: 20 Sep 89 06:02:01 GMT
References: <17735@looking.on.ca>
Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy NY
Lines: 8

None of the alternate hierarchies should even be included in Brad's
report card, since you claim it addresses the group creation
guidelines.  That drops the size of the article considerably.  Yes,
there are still other aspects of his analysis that have merit, yet
including gnu, alt, bionet, unix-pc, u3b and the inet groups is simply
misleading.
--
 (setq mail '("tale@pawl.rpi.edu" "tale@itsgw.rpi.edu" "tale@rpitsmts.bitnet"))