Path: utzoo!mnetor!motto!ecijmm!eci386!jmm From: jmm@eci386.UUCP Newsgroups: news.software.b Subject: Re: Forwarding Cancels For Unreceived Articles Keywords: anecdotal, long Message-ID: <1989Sep19.164120.26245@eci386.uucp> Date: 19 Sep 89 16:41:20 GMT References: <5200@looking.on.ca> <66812@uunet.UU.NET> <1989Sep7.151826.11816@i88.isc.com> <3919@hplabsz.HPL.HP.COM> <5553@videovax.tv.Tek.com> <11111@looking.on.ca> Reply-To: jmm@eci386.UUCP (John Macdonald) Organization: R. H. Lathwell Associates: Elegant Communications, Inc. Lines: 33 In article <11111@looking.on.ca> brad@looking.on.ca (Brad Templeton) writes: > [...] > >All I know is that I put out around 200 cancel messages per day. Most >of them should never leave this site, and only a few are intended to >make it more than one or two sites downstream. Supersedes would have >been a lot easier but we all know why I couldn't use it. > >It will cause no harm to send them all out over the whole subnet, it will >just waste disk space and money. >-- >Brad Templeton, Looking Glass Software Ltd. -- Waterloo, Ontario 519/884-7473 Most of the discussion about the "cancels should be propagated netwide" is perfectly correct, yet Brad's case shows an important exception. If a cancel is processed on the original system and can ensure that the article has never left that system (and is not irretrievably batched to leave the system), then it is safe to handle the cancel locally only. After the article has left the original system, then the earlier arguments that the cancel should be propagated netwide are appropriate. The trick is determining whether an article has "left the system". I make no claims about whether such a determination can be accurately made with any of the current news transport mechanisms (particularily for all possible combinations of batched/unbatched ihave/sendme partial feeds, etc.), but I expect that C-news provides enough flexibility for a knowlegable sysadmin to extend it to make such determinations for his own specific configuration. -- "Software and cathedrals are much the same - | John Macdonald first we build them, then we pray" (Sam Redwine) | jmm@eci386