Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!oscsuna.osc.edu!illini.osc.edu!djh
From: djh@illini.osc.edu (David Heisterberg)
Newsgroups: sci.bio
Subject: Re: Why AZT is so expensive
Message-ID: <315@oscsuna.osc.edu>
Date: 17 Sep 89 18:33:06 GMT
References: <26871@shemp.CS.UCLA.EDU> <1187@nih-csl.UUCP> <2434@aecom.yu.edu> <2446@aecom.yu.edu>
Sender: news@oscsuna.osc.edu
Lines: 12


I'm not going to make any excuses for drug companies either, but in the
vanishingly small part I have in all of this, I will have spent the
equivalent of $1M to do a potential energy surface calculation for just
one possible new anti-HIV drug.  Research costs can be just astronomical.
And you know the saying, "If we knew what we were doing it wouldn't be
research."  For every drug that makes it out, there can be hundreds to
thousands that don't.  Burroughs-Wellcome may be over-charging, they may
not.  I don't know all the facts - do you?

David J. Heisterberg
Ohio Supercomputer Center