Xref: utzoo rec.ham-radio:13337 sci.electronics:7834 Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!zephyr.ens.tek.com!tektronix!sequent!mntgfx!mbutts From: mbutts@mentor.com (Mike Butts) Newsgroups: rec.ham-radio,sci.electronics Subject: New cheap 200 kHz ADC: good for digital receiver? Message-ID: <1989Sep19.171259.1670@mentor.com> Date: 19 Sep 89 17:12:59 GMT Organization: engr Lines: 28 The current Electronic Design (9/14/89) has a piece on the new Burr-Brown PCM1705P, a monolithic dual analog-to-digital converter. It runs at 200 kHz, gives 14-bit accuracy and 18-bit resolution, and costs $27 in 1K quantity (I'd guess <$50 in onesies). It's designed for high-end home audio, DAT and effects and such, but the article is mostly about how you can hook it to a DSP & use it for medical, telecommunications, spectrum analysis, imaging, etc. I wonder if any DSP radio experts out there can comment on whether this chip, with an 80 kHz or so IF front end on the input and a DSP on the output might make a practical HF receiver, using the DSP for most of the selectivity, gain control, and demodulation? Is it reasonable to use that low an IF? Could you use both ADCs on the chip to alternatively sample a higher IF, like 160 kHz? Imagine how fast, cheap ADCs and DSPs could cause a revolution in receiver design (especially when we get cheap ADCs and DSPs that can handle several MHz IFs, and direct digital synth chips to match): Antenna ---> Mixer ---> LPF/gain --> ADC -----> DSP -----> DAC -----> audio ^ | | | DDSynth \------> data A few real RF stages + cheap digital VLSI = high-performance receiver? -- Michael Butts, Research Engineer KC7IT 503-626-1302 Mentor Graphics Corp., 8500 SW Creekside Place, Beaverton, OR 97005 !{sequent,tessi,apollo}!mntgfx!mbutts mbutts@pdx.MENTOR.COM Opinions are my own, not necessarily those of Mentor Graphics Corp.