Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!amdahl!amdcad!military
From: gwh%headcrash.Berkeley.EDU@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU (George William Herbert)
Newsgroups: sci.military
Subject: Re: Aerial missiles
Message-ID: <27378@amdcad.AMD.COM>
Date: 20 Sep 89 07:46:45 GMT
Sender: cdr@amdcad.AMD.COM
Organization: ucb
Lines: 28
Approved: military@amdcad.amd.com



From: gwh%headcrash.Berkeley.EDU@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU (George William Herbert)

>From sci.military Digest  Thu, 14 Sep, 1989  Volume 2 : Issue 96
>I've added data to George's article, comparing his information to that of
>"Gallery of USAF Weapons" (May 1984), by Susan Young and John Taylor of
>_Janes's_.

The specific stuff Mike posted was in some cases more and some cases less 
accurate than what i did.  In particular, the weights all check out, but
the missile ranges are more accurate in my origional posting.  The air 
force loves to say " greater than..." in describing missiles, and what I 
used were second sources and Jane's and etc...

Is there interest in more than this?  We could do a large factual list of 
everything (prepare it wrt Janes' Av Week PG, etc.)  if it's wanted.

	[A large factual list of everything!  Ought to be
	pretty big... :-) I find well-researched lists to be a
	very useful part of sci.military.  I'd rather not see
	lots of articles back and forth refining the details,
	but if you want to work out such a list by e-mail and
	then post the final result, I'd enjoy seeing it.  --CDR]

--
George William Herbert  UCB Naval Architecture Dpt. (my god, even on schedule!)
maniac@garnet.berkeley.edu  gwh@ocf.berkeley.edu