Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!cmcl2!dasys1!jpr
From: jpr@dasys1.UUCP (Jean-Pierre Radley)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Abandon NULL for (0)
Message-ID: <10839@dasys1.UUCP>
Date: 3 Oct 89 21:19:53 GMT
References: <14718@bfmny0.UU.NET> <8241@goofy.megatest.UUCP>
Reply-To: jpr@dasys1.UUCP (Jean-Pierre Radley)
Organization: TANGENT
Lines: 14

In article <8241@goofy.megatest.UUCP> djones@megatest.UUCP (Dave Jones) writes:
>This topic comes up in this group every now and then. After all the arguing
>is over -- and it can take months -- the survivers come to the conclusion
>that NULL is a mistake, but it's too late to correct it. Just say,
>(FILE*)0, or (char*)0, or whatever.

I have found my code to more readable if I use these two defines:

#define	NULLC (char *)0
#define NULLF (FILE *)0

-- 
Jean-Pierre Radley					      jpr@jpradley.uucp
New York, NY					      72160.1341@compuserve.com