Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!ginosko!uunet!philmtl!ray
From: ray@philmtl.philips.ca (Ray Dunn)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: This one bit me today
Message-ID: <750@philmtl.philips.ca>
Date: 6 Oct 89 19:58:03 GMT
References: <2432@hub.UUCP> <568@sppy00.UUCP>
Reply-To: ray@philmtl.philips.ca (Ray Dunn)
Organization: Philips Electronics Ltd. -  St. Laurent  P.Q., Canada
Lines: 25

In article <568@sppy00.UUCP> dwb@sppy00.UUCP (David Burhans) writes:
>In article <2432@hub.UUCP> dougp@voodoo.ucsb.edu writes:
>4>   c=b/*p;
> > First real flaw in the C grammer I have found.
>
>This is not a flaw in the C grammer, it is a flaw in the c programmer.

This, as we all know by now of course, is a matter of religion. So let me
restate the principles of *my* sect:

No this *is* a flaw in the C grammer, because it does not take into account
what a perfectly reasonably human is likely to do erroneously.

To say that it is not the fault of 'C' which leaves this pitfall (and the
others we know and love), for we mortals to fall into, is like blaming the
driver in an accident caused by the car's gas and brake pedals being
positioned too close.

Obviously the driver is not operating the controls properly, but it is the
design of the controls that makes it *easy* to make the mistake.
-- 
Ray Dunn.                    | UUCP: ray@philmt.philips.ca
Philips Electronics Ltd.     |       ..!{uunet|philapd|philabs}!philmtl!ray
600 Dr Frederik Philips Blvd | TEL : (514) 744-8200  Ext : 2347 (Phonemail)
St Laurent. Quebec.  H4M 2S9 | FAX : (514) 744-6455  TLX : 05-824090