Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!wugate!uunet!mcsun!ukc!icdoc!parlmain
From: parlmain@doc.ic.ac.uk (Parlog Maintenance)
Newsgroups: comp.object
Subject: Re: Object Oriented Logic Programming
Message-ID: <1058@gould.doc.ic.ac.uk>
Date: 10 Oct 89 12:06:26 GMT
References: <1989Sep30.201033.25047@rpi.edu> <6654@hubcap.clemson.edu> <NABIEL.89Oct2181804@isis.sics.se>
Reply-To: parlmain@doc.ic.ac.uk (Parlog Maintenance)
Organization: Dept. of Computing, Imperial College, London, UK.
Lines: 25


Dear All,
  Back in April, I completed a survey paper entitled :

  Design Issues for LP-based OOP languages

It attempts to look at nearly all the present languages in
terms of 7 design issues. A further classification is done
by grouping the languages into 4 implementation 'views'.
  If anybody wants a copy, can they send their requests to :

      The Secretary,
      The Parlog Group,
      Dept. of Computing,
      Imperial College,
      London SW7
      England.

While on the subject, I've just finished my thesis which is
about the language 'Polka', which combines OOP and Parlog (a
concurrent LP language). The combination is quite different
from the Vulcan approach, mentioned in an earlier message.

                     Andrew Davison
                     ad@doc.ic.ac.uk