Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!apple!oliveb!mipos3!omepd!iwarpr0!pcm
From: pcm@iwarpr0.intel.com (Phil C. Miller)
Newsgroups: comp.os.minix
Subject: Re: Job Control in POSIX compatible Minix ?
Message-ID: <5029@omepd.UUCP>
Date: 10 Oct 89 12:22:17 GMT
References: <5490006@eecs.nwu.edu> <3546@ast.cs.vu.nl>
Sender: news@omepd.UUCP
Reply-To: pcm@iwarpr0.UUCP (Phil C. Miller)
Organization: Intel Corp., Hillsboro
Lines: 25



In article <3546@ast.cs.vu.nl> ast@cs.vu.nl (Andy Tanenbaum) writes:
>In article <5490006@eecs.nwu.edu> naim@eecs.nwu.edu (Naim Abdullah) writes:
>>I was wondering whether the (future) POSIX compatible Minix
>>have job control ?
>>
>>   Naim




>No. Non. Nee. Nein. Nyet.
>In short, absolutely, definitively, no.
>Andy Tanenbaum (ast@cs.vu.nl)



Andy, I'm not sure I understand your answer because it was so ambiguous.
Do you mean that you don't object to job control?  ;-)


Phil Miller
pcm@iwarp.intel.com or
{...}!tektronix!ogccse!pcm