Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!uxa.cso.uiuc.edu!kmh20822
From: kmh20822@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Kevin Hill)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: VirusX 3.2, VirusX 3.1
Keywords: virusx,amiga
Message-ID: <1989Oct12.205215.13565@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>
Date: 12 Oct 89 20:52:15 GMT
References: <1389@ultb.UUCP> <1940@sactoh0.UUCP> <2233@cbnewsl.ATT.COM>
Sender: news@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (News)
Reply-To: kmh20822@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Kevin Hill)
Organization: V-Network
Lines: 10


While I don't know if my version of 3.2 misses the SCA virus sometimes, it has
FOUND it on disks at least three times and appearently got rid of it. (The 
virus was even on the disk I got VirusX on!) So appearently either I have a
3.1 that was hacked to call itself 3.2 (not likely) or else somebody has made
a version that is SCA friendly!

Just my personal experiences with a week old 500...
--kevin
--