Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!shadooby!netnews.engin.umich.edu!caen.engin.umich.edu!conliffe From: conliffe@caen.engin.umich.edu (Darryl C. Conliffe) Newsgroups: comp.sys.apollo Subject: Re: Apollo won't release rbak/wbak format. grrr. Summary: Is it necessary? Message-ID: <46080999.14df5@ulsoy.engin.umich.edu> Date: 4 Oct 89 19:56 GMT References: <26979@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu> Organization: U of M Engineering, Ann Arbor, Mich. Lines: 18 In article <26979@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu>, sahayman@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu (Steve Hayman) writes: > > We do all of our nightly dumps to an Exabyte tape drive on a Sun and > use a variety of formats in the process - dump, tar, cpio and wbak. > I wanted to find out some details of the wbak format so that I could > run some simple tools on the Sun to give me a table of contents > of the tape. So I called Apollo, and their response is that > "the rbak/wbak format is unpublished and we don't want to give it out." > Is knowledge of the internal format necessary? Why not index the tape for a TOC? How do you gen the tape in the first place? -- ___________________ Darryl C. Conliffe conliffe@caen.engin.umich.edu (313) 721-6069 -------------------