Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!ginosko!usc!henry.jpl.nasa.gov!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!news
From: dave@jplopto.Jpl.Nasa.Gov (Dave Hayes)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apollo
Subject: Re: the deafening silence
Message-ID: <1989Oct11.090926.24253@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov>
Date: 11 Oct 89 09:09:26 GMT
References: <1989Oct5.224148.19484@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov> <46208967.208ba@apollo.HP.COM>
Reply-To: dave%jplopto@jpl-mil.jpl.nasa.gov
Organization: Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Lines: 33

Ollie Jones writes:
>For what it's worth, our news-posting software has been "living
>in interesting times" lately, because HP makes extensive internal
>use of news, and we've been getting updated to be compatible
>with that.  For a while, outbound postings were fouled up.  Therefore,
>someone may have answered your posting, and you may not have received
>the answer.  Sorry.

OH! Ok...I had thought that this might be the case, but you never know 
until you actually make some noise. 

>And, I hope you won't hold it against me and
>other apollo R&D USENET readers if we sometimes
>don't answer every question.

Not personally, no. Ideally you guys would at least ACKNOWLEDGE most
messages that don't get much of an answer (e.g. "Gee, uh...got your 
message but couldn't answer it").
 
>I looked back in the history for your message.  It got flushed...
>Why don't you repost it?

Well...all I really want are valid template files for use with INPROT
that give you as secure a system as the darned ACL's can make it. 

When I posted my original message, I was struggling with things like
finding out which parts of the OS I could get away with protecting before
the OS was protected against itself. 

I just figured that it was truly a waste to provide INPROT and not provide
templates. You guys had templates at 9.7, why not at 10.1?

-Dave Hayes